Thanks! I can confirm that my brokers are able to Discover each other.
But from your earlier statements 'you'll won't be able to share databases' 'they would all have their own persistence stores' I see no reason why this won't work - so is this something not-recommended by activeMQ? becuase of locking/performance issues? As I mentioned earlier my intention is to let both the brokers running http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustered-JBoss-and-JDBC-Master-Slave-td2348023.html#a2348028 My design is similar to the diagram in the above link. Only difference in instead of finding a master, (load balance r will ensure that) messages are sent to both the brokers when they are healthy. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-clustering-integrated-with-JBoss-tp4668358p4668426.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
