Something like 860 KB/sec of text encapsulated into JMS messages of about 150 bytes each one, coming from 42 machines. The problem is that we need to do some parsing of the messages on the machine, and that the number of clients could potentially grow. That's why we need some brokers to be Master.
The only way to provide HA and Load Balancing is to increase the number of server in pairs (master/slave)? Thanks. James.Strachan wrote: > > On 19/11/2007, ktecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> We need to receive JMS log messages from several machines. Initially, >> we're >> going to setup 2 machines, but this is expected to grow as the load grows >> as >> well. That's why I cannot use the Master/Slave1/Slave2/Slave3 schema. I >> need >> all the brokers to be up and running, and if one of them fails (the >> machine >> shuts down), the other brokers should process the messages of the broker >> that has failed. > > I repeat - what kind of load are you talking about? A single > master/slave cluster can usually handle most peoples load requirements > - as its easy to scale with just more producers & consumers. > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://open.iona.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/High-Availability-and-Load-Balancing-tf4838228s2354.html#a13844866 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
