On 19/11/2007, ktecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We need to receive JMS log messages from several machines. Initially, we're > going to setup 2 machines, but this is expected to grow as the load grows as > well. That's why I cannot use the Master/Slave1/Slave2/Slave3 schema. I need > all the brokers to be up and running, and if one of them fails (the machine > shuts down), the other brokers should process the messages of the broker > that has failed.
I repeat - what kind of load are you talking about? A single master/slave cluster can usually handle most peoples load requirements - as its easy to scale with just more producers & consumers. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com
