We need to receive JMS log messages from several machines. Initially, we're going to setup 2 machines, but this is expected to grow as the load grows as well. That's why I cannot use the Master/Slave1/Slave2/Slave3 schema. I need all the brokers to be up and running, and if one of them fails (the machine shuts down), the other brokers should process the messages of the broker that has failed.
What should be the best approach to this needs? Thanks. James.Strachan wrote: > > Note that "network of brokers" usually means a store and forward > network traditionally, which is not a master/slave cluster which is > what you probably want. > > BTW what kind of load do you need? I suspect a single master/slave > cluster of brokers is all you need. > > > On 19/11/2007, ktecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have been reading the ActiveMQ documentation but something isn't >> entirelly >> clear to me. >> >> I need to setup a network of brokers with the following requirements: >> - I need all of them to be able to attend requests, to provide Load >> Balancing between all the brokers / servers. >> - I need that if one of them fails, its messages can be consumed by other >> brokers. >> >> Can this be done actually with ActiveMQ? If not, what's the closer >> approach >> to this scenary I have in mind? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance, >> >> Luis Miguel García >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/High-Availability-and-Load-Balancing-tf4838228s2354.html#a13841668 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://open.iona.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/High-Availability-and-Load-Balancing-tf4838228s2354.html#a13844122 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
