You missed the point, Craig. He was not trying to "sell" anything. He was talking about the gapping holes in your logic about "meritocracy". You, as usual, ignored any serious debate on your own Struts "meritocracy" claims and jumped to the wholly irrelevant question whether Apache works. Please try to focus. It is so hard to talk to you about things because you jump around like this an fail to follow even your own "train" of thought. Essentially you have argued that your own claims are irrelevant.
<snip> On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/20/06, Al Eridani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To be a meritocracy, more than the already elected committers would have > > to participate in the election. > > > I'll be fascinated to watch you try to sell that approach to Apache at > large > :-). I don't think you'll get very far, though ... there is a lot of > evidence that this kind of culture is pretty good at building successful > software, on a large varieties of what you might mean by > "successful". And > *all* of the various project communities here work this way. </snip> -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
