Ted Husted on 05/12/05 12:54, wrote:
IMHO, I don't see the engineering value-add of a "one size fits all"
framework. A framework is a semi-complete application, and action/page
applications are built differently than event/component frameworks.
Since the applications are different, the frameworks should be
different too.
Surely the framework (singular) wraps the HTTP request response paradigm?
Some people in our community want to dive into JavaServer Faces, and
others want to pursue the tried-and-true action-orientated approach.
Rather than burn bridges, we're built a bigger roof :)
I like the analogy. Thanks for the clarification.
Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
