On 12/5/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Of course. Never meant to imply you were in an ivory tower. Just that > whether Struts has a marketing arm or not, the reality is that for many > of us, what technology we can choose for X job in part hinges on the > *perception* of Struts. So given the current state of Struts it would do > some good to clarify and simplify the direction Struts is headed. Maybe > make sure that X version of Struts is component-based, Y version is > action based, etc. That way it's easier not just to choose what to use, > but it doesn't muddy the waters for the non-technical decision makers as > to what exactly Struts is.
In your expressions above, X = Struts Shale and Y = Struts Action Framework. Both are being actively developed in the Struts community (along with several other related technologies). Preston Craig
