Service is ready to be committed :) waiting for the issue :))) On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Do you need only version? > > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved > Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also provided > revision n buildDate. > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> could you please create JIRA issue? > Yes, I will create it. > > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Seems great. Thanks. > >>> > >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers .... > >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like InfoWebService > .... > >>> > with SOAP method getVersion > >>> > with REST method GET /info/version > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in > 'ServerWebService' ? > >>> >> > >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for this? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code should be > configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2 then don't > call getSession method, call directly login method. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself .... > >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :( > >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it? > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM version > from the links you provided. > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start with ... > >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :)) > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? If > not, please guide me how can I create one. > >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you. > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to work > with new REST services as expected > >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :) > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be compatible > with this API ? > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :)) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the > number of requests required (2 against 3) :) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more compact :) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com > <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good idea. > Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can embed > example request and responses a lot more easy. > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed" > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method signatures > have changed. But the logical flow is the same. > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/ > thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :(((( > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger to > REST .... > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups error, > user, group, room recording etc. > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and > produces both XML and JSON) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I haven't > added PUT) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, > seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST > (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change? > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the > same, right ? > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here: > http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here > http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: > http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/ > openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation :( > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451 > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :) > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older > version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to > OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as > well as write new code for newer APIs. > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which let us > know version of Openmeetings. > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > WBR > >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > WBR > >>> > Maxim aka solomax > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> WBR > >> Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
