I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for this? On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code should be > configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2 then don't > call getSession method, call directly login method. > > On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > hmm the version of OM itself .... > > we never has API call for this :( > > It can be easily added, but why do you need it? > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM version from the > links you provided. > >> > >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > I already provide you with number of links to start with ... > >> > do you need more :)) > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? If not, please > guide me how can I create one. > >> >> Thank you. > >> >> > >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to work with new > REST services as expected > >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :) > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be compatible with this > API ? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > >: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :)) > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the number of > requests required (2 against 3) :) > >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more compact :) > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good idea. Especially > to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can embed example > request and responses a lot more easy. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed" > >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method signatures have > changed. But the logical flow is the same. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this > >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :(((( > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger to REST .... > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF > >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups error, user, > group, room recording etc. > >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up > >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and produces both > XML and JSON) > >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I haven't added PUT) > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST > (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change? > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the same, right ? > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here: > http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u) > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here http://openmeetings. > apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: http://openmeetings. > apache.org/RestAPISample.html > >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/ > openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation :( > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: https://issues.apache. > org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451 > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :) > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan Patil < > thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older version of > Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to OM 3.1.2, we > realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as well as write > new code for newer APIs. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which let us know > version of Openmeetings. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> -- > >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >>> WBR > >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > WBR > >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > WBR > >> > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
