ok :)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can retrieve
> particular info from key instead of index.
>
> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > yep it is OK :)
> > Thanks
> >
> > how would you like to get revision and build date?
> > as Object with fields
> > {
> > version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT,
> > revision: xxxxxxxxxx,
> > buildDate: 2016-08-19
> > }
> >
> > as (list of Strings)
> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"]
> >
> > via additional method(s) ?
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is
> correctly done?
> >>
> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Service is ready to be committed :)
> >> > waiting for the issue :)))
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Do you need only version?
> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved
> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also
> provided revision n buildDate.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue?
> >> >> Yes, I will create it.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers ....
> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like
> InfoWebService ....
> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion
> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in
> 'ServerWebService' ?
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for
> this?
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code
> should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2
> then don't call getSession method, call directly login method.
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself ....
> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :(
> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it?
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM
> version from the links you provided.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start
> with ...
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :))
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil <
> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version?
> If not, please guide me how can I create one.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated
> to work with new REST services as expected
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM,
> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be
> compatible with this API ?
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :))
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the
> number of requests required (2 against 3) :)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more
> compact :)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM,
> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good
> idea. Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can
> embed example request and responses a lot more easy.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed"
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method
> signatures have changed. But the logical flow is the same.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/
> thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim
> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :((((
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger
> to REST ....
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim
> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups
> error, user, group, room recording etc.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and
> produces both XML and JSON)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I
> haven't added PUT)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM,
> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST
> (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change?
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are
> the same, right ?
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik
> <solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed
> here: http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here
> http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here:
> http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/
> openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much
> documentation :(
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :)
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan
> Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older
> version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to
> OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as
> well as write new code for newer APIs.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which
> let us know version of Openmeetings.
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >> > --
> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR
> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > --
> >> >> >>> >> > WBR
> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > --
> >> >> >>> > WBR
> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> WBR
> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > WBR
> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > WBR
> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
