Hello Maxim, great! I will test it on monday.
Thnak you very much for your work! ;-) greetings, Michael Am 23.11.13 19:36, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > Hello Michael, > > I just have downgraded red5 version in 2.x branch :( > So you can have 2.1.1 version of red5 (with all its pros and contras) with > 2.2 fixes in REST/SOAP, Flash and screen sharing. > > Build is started > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%202.x/ > Please wait for #21 > > Will wait for your feedback :) > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Michael Wuttke < > michael.wut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote: > >> Hello Maxim, >> >> thank you for your answer. >> >> In this case, is it possible for you to backport some of the changes >> between the version 2.1.1 and 2.2 - like zooming - to participate from >> the better functionality? Could you create an update of OM 2.1.1 on >> jenkins or should I wait until you fixed the issues of OM 2.2? >> >> Thank you, >> Michael >> >> Am 08.11.2013 06:35, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>> Hello Michael, >>> >>> Unfortunately 2.2 is not stable enough to be released. We are currently >>> trying to localize and resolve the issue with it >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Michael Wuttke >>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de <mailto:mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> is there a reason why the version of openmeetings 2.2.0 is not >>> officially released like the version 2.1.1 on your homepage: >>> http://openmeetings.apache.org or at your blog: >>> >> https://blogs.apache.org/__openmeetings/entry/apache___openmeetings_2_1_11 >>> < >> https://blogs.apache.org/openmeetings/entry/apache_openmeetings_2_1_11>? >>> >>> Is the OM version 2.2 only for testing purposes and/or is it not a >>> stable version? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Michael >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >> > > >
