This is the version used in 2.1.1
Some features works better, some worse :(
On Nov 24, 2013 1:40 AM, "Sergey" <iamtutor...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Махim, hello :)
> Is this version of red5 more stable? Or need testing.
>
> Sergey
>
> 23.11.2013 22:36, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
>  I just have downgraded red5 version in 2.x branch :(
> So you can have 2.1.1 version of red5 (with all its pros and contras) with
> 2.2 fixes in REST/SOAP, Flash and screen sharing.
>
>  Build is started
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%202.x/
> Please wait for #21
>
>  Will wait for your feedback :)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Michael Wuttke <
> michael.wut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote:
>
>> Hello Maxim,
>>
>> thank you for your answer.
>>
>> In this case, is it possible for you to backport some of the changes
>> between the version 2.1.1 and 2.2 - like zooming - to participate from
>> the better functionality? Could you create an update of OM 2.1.1 on
>> jenkins or should I wait until you fixed the issues of OM 2.2?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Michael
>>
>> Am 08.11.2013 06:35, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> > Hello Michael,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately 2.2 is not stable enough to be released. We are currently
>> > trying to localize and resolve the issue with it
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Michael Wuttke
>> > <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de <mailto:mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hello,
>> >
>> >     is there a reason why the version of openmeetings 2.2.0 is not
>> >     officially released like the version 2.1.1 on your homepage:
>> >     http://openmeetings.apache.org or at your blog:
>> >
>> https://blogs.apache.org/__openmeetings/entry/apache___openmeetings_2_1_11
>> >     <
>> https://blogs.apache.org/openmeetings/entry/apache_openmeetings_2_1_11>?
>> >
>> >     Is the OM version 2.2 only for testing purposes and/or is it not a
>> >     stable version?
>> >
>> >     Thank you,
>> >     Michael
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>

Reply via email to