Current cluster architecture was designed to be able to host OM room on separate server. So cluster can help you to have several large rooms, but not to allow several servers to serve 1 room.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net>wrote: > BTW, **** > > ** ** > > Can OM server cluster help to increase the meeting rooms load, such as > support more persons? **** > > ** ** > > Jinjun**** > > ** ** > > *发件人**:* Feng Jinjun 冯金军 > *发送时间:* Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:04 AM > > *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list > *抄送:* pccom.fr...@gmail.com > *主题:* 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings**** > > ** ** > > In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter > or two share their slides and video. Based on my estimation, we need about > 400+ students. With one server, I am afraid it cannot support so much load. > **** > > For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to > separate the voice mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load. ** > ** > > ** ** > > It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year. **** > > ** ** > > Jinjun**** > > ** ** > > *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com<solomax...@gmail.com>] > > *发送时间:* Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM > *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list > *抄送:* pccom.fr...@gmail.com > *主题:* Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings**** > > ** ** > > 1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I > believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will > share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our > tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video**** > > ** ** > > 2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are > are awent through the server.**** > > ** ** > > 3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be > able to release it before the end of the year.**** > > ** ** > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net> > wrote:**** > > Thanks for reply. **** > > **** > > 1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room? **** > > 2) FS means freeswitch. **** > > 3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ? **** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > **** > > *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > *发送时间:* Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM > *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list; pccom.fr...@gmail.com > *主题:* Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings**** > > **** > > 1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested > that**** > > 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS**** > > 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 > room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without > flash (I really hope so)**** > > **** > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pccom.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:**** > > Unsubscribe**** > > Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net> **** > > *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000**** > > *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<user@openmeetings.apache.org>**** > > *ReplyTo: *user@openmeetings.apache.org **** > > *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings**** > > **** > > Hi Experts,**** > > **** > > I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? * > *** > > **** > > 1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have > ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is > true? **** > > 2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the > conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will > bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. **** > > 3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the > OM? **** > > 4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found > only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 > proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. **** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > > > **** > > **** > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax **** > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
