1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video
2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through the server. 3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release it before the end of the year. On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net>wrote: > Thanks for reply. **** > > ** ** > > **1) **With the cluster, can we support more person in one room? **** > > **2) **FS means freeswitch. **** > > **3) **I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ? **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > ** ** > > *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > *发送时间:* Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM > *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list; pccom.fr...@gmail.com > *主题:* Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings**** > > ** ** > > 1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested > that**** > > 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS**** > > 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 > room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without > flash (I really hope so)**** > > ** ** > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pccom.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:**** > > Unsubscribe**** > > Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net> **** > > *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000**** > > *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<user@openmeetings.apache.org>**** > > *ReplyTo: *user@openmeetings.apache.org **** > > *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings**** > > ** ** > > Hi Experts,**** > > **** > > I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? * > *** > > **** > > 1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have > ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is > true? **** > > 2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the > conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will > bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. **** > > 3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the > OM? **** > > 4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found > only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 > proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. **** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax **** > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
