1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pccom.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unsubscribe > Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®. > ------------------------------ > *From: * Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net> > *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000 > *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<user@openmeetings.apache.org> > *ReplyTo: * user@openmeetings.apache.org > *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings > > Hi Experts,**** > > ** ** > > I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? * > *** > > **** > > **1. **How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I > have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it > is true? **** > > **2. **Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the > conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will > bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. **** > > **3. **Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and > the OM? **** > > **4. **HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I > found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail > for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
