This issue is beyond dead. Can we please move on?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >> >>> Hi Jacopo, >>> >>> This is my understanding of the conflict in interest: >>> >>> 1) Ofbiz as an ecommerce focused application with ERP that is developed >>> on top of unstable trunk and kept updated via svn and patches. >>> >>> versus >>> >>> 2) Ofbiz as a stable shrink wrapped ERP application that has professional >>> releases and smooth updates (e.g. for security). Also, the separation of >>> Ofbiz as a standalone modular development platform with add on ERP modules. >> >> Are you saying that the I am a supporter of #1? No, this is not true, and >> this is not what OFBiz is. Again, I think that you don't read with enough >> attention the emails or that you don't think enough before sending your >> reply. I would suggest you to spend more time studying instead of throwing >> out wrong and misleading assertions. What you are saying is simply not real. >> >> Jacopo > > It seems to me he's formed an inaccurate picture of OFBiz in his head, and > he's trying to convince everyone it is true. > > I don't know where the idea that OFBiz is not modular came from. OFBiz IS > modular. And like any other modular architecture, some modules depend on > other modules. > > This conversation is going nowhere. Let's just move on. > > -Adrian >
