Michael,

why do you think it is time for a fork? It seems to me a crazy conversation...

Jacopo

On Nov 13, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:

> hi Ruth,
> 
> I do agree with you that it is time for a fork in the road. But before that,
> maybe it is better to split ofbiz into subprojects, like framework, BI, etc.
> Then we can choose where to fork. And also the future merge should be
> easier.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Michael Xu (xudong)
> www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135
> 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ruth Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Chris:
>> 
>> IMHO: Having watched the project for a long time now, I think it is time
>> for a fork in the road. There are too many competing interests here. This
>> sort of reminds me of Unix before AT& T let BSD birth. No? And look what
>> that spawned :-)
>> 
>> Ruth
>> 
>> 
>> Christopher Snow wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks BJ - that's the conclusion I'm starting to reach.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps it would be worth some of us like minded people to getting
>>> together?
>>> 
>>> BJ Freeman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I had the same complaint at one time.
>>>> I now keep my own version under a different brand name.
>>>> That is about all you can do.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Christopher Snow sent the following on 11/13/2009 2:40 AM:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was thinking about your comment of leaving the components in place
>>>>>>> even though they are not used.  Does leaving unused components in
>>>>>>> place have a performance impact on ofbiz?  Do those components
>>>>>>> consume memory? - they are certainly using disk space.  Some of the
>>>>>>> components for example BIRT consume a fair amount of space.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Disk and memory are very cheap nowadays...
>>>>>> I think I have answered your other concerns in another email.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Disk and memory are cheap nowadays, but small businesses don't see it
>>>>> like that, for example David Jones' ezBiz will be competing with
>>>>> lightweight applications like OpenERP.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, there's the security issues of having code running that isn't
>>>>> required.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyway, I get the picture. A modular ofbiz is not an option! People in
>>>>> control like ofbiz just the way it is - it suits their business model.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to