On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

> Hi Chris:
> 
> IMHO: Having watched the project for a long time now, I think it is time for 
> a fork in the road. There are too many competing interests here.

Uh... I am missing your point now: what are the competing interests that you 
are mentioning? I don't see any competing interest in this thread.

> This sort of reminds me of Unix before AT& T let BSD birth. No? And look what 
> that spawned :-)

Yes, it could become the Linux equivalent for the OFBiz world... or it could 
become one of the many thousands of forks (the 99%) in the history of software 
projects that just are ignored.

Jacopo

> 
> Ruth
> 
> Christopher Snow wrote:
>> Thanks BJ - that's the conclusion I'm starting to reach.
>> 
>> Perhaps it would be worth some of us like minded people to getting together?
>> 
>> BJ Freeman wrote:
>>> I had the same complaint at one time.
>>> I now keep my own version under a different brand name.
>>> That is about all you can do.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Christopher Snow sent the following on 11/13/2009 2:40 AM:
>>> 
>>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>      
>>>>>> I was thinking about your comment of leaving the components in place
>>>>>> even though they are not used.  Does leaving unused components in
>>>>>> place have a performance impact on ofbiz?  Do those components
>>>>>> consume memory? - they are certainly using disk space.  Some of the
>>>>>> components for example BIRT consume a fair amount of space.
>>>>>>            
>>>>> Disk and memory are very cheap nowadays...
>>>>> I think I have answered your other concerns in another email.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>      
>>>> Disk and memory are cheap nowadays, but small businesses don't see it
>>>> like that, for example David Jones' ezBiz will be competing with
>>>> lightweight applications like OpenERP.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, there's the security issues of having code running that isn't
>>>> required.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, I get the picture. A modular ofbiz is not an option! People in
>>>> control like ofbiz just the way it is - it suits their business model.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to