I volunteer myself for creating either ant based or Maven based distribution if there a willingness and someone ready to commit my patches. Maven2 may be good option as it can pull the dependencies. Also Ant and Maven can co exist and people who like Ant can keep using it.

Thanks,

Raj

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Jonatan,

From: "jonatan soto" <[email protected]>
Maven can also solve the problem of the distributable releases, centralize a repository for the modules and much more. The inclusion of Maven affects all
the life cycle of any project improving the control of all the required
phases. But i understand that Ofbiz is a very huge and mature project so
that means it will be very difficult to integrate it.

I agree Maven 2 is great but, you got the point <<very difficult to integrate ...>>.
We have other priorities...

Thanks

Jacques

From my point of view, it's very dificult to decide between Ofbiz and other
ERP. As a new user/developer I see Ofbiz almost focused to ecommerce that is very convenient for my present ecommerce project but in the other hand I see
Ofbiz dificult to 'sell' if I decide to do some consulting for a
non-ecommerce companies. Anyway I will bet for Ofbiz because it is an Apache project, and it makes me more confortable even more when I think how Apache
projects have been changed my developer life.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Abdullah Shaikh <
[email protected]> wrote:

I am not sure, I haven't tried this, but could commenting the not required
components from component-load.xml file have helped ?

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Snow <
[email protected]> wrote:

> When I tried to remove the unwanted components, I can into dependency
> problems. A modular approach to using the components such as maven would
> stop the developer having to manually work out dependencies to remove
> components.
>
> Leaving the unwanted components in place even though they don't get used
> makes DBA's and support people twitchy, asking questions like "why are
all
> those tables created even though they aren't used?"
>
>
> Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
>
>> Chris, I guess you mean to simplify the things, but then Ofbiz doesn't
>> force
>> to use all components, user can use only the required components and can
>> ignore the rest.
>>
>> As you said, probably party management, maybe someone else wants to only >> order management or only ecommerce, so if all the components are there,
>> user
>> can decide which one to use.
>>
>> -Abdullah
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Christopher Snow <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> If a company start using ofbiz for small applications using just the
>>> development framework, they can be very productive within a few weeks.
>>> However, if they have to take on board the whole of ofbiz (i.e. the
>>> components) before they get started, that is a huge task that may put
>>> them
>>> off using ofbiz.
>>>
>>> If ofbiz followed the modular approach using maven, companies could
start
>>> using ofbiz core (+ probably party management), and then use more and
>>> more
>>> of the other components as they get more experienced.
>>>  Charles TJ - SELC Sales Div wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I am agree with you Chris, the OFBiz is an excellent framework;
>>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>>>
>>>> - Charles TJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Christopher Snow [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: 13 Nopember 2009 15:18
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework. I think that
>>>> any
>>>> efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract
newcomers
>>>> to
>>>> the project. In the past, I have recommended ofbiz as a development >>>> framework to a few architects and senior developers that I have worked
>>>> with.
>>>> When they take a look at the ofbiz site, their first reaction is to
>>>> reject
>>>> ofbiz as they think it is just another ecommerce application.
>>>>
>>>> I know a few of the users on the mailing list would like to see the
core
>>>> development framework of ofbiz separated from the other components.
>>>>
>>>> It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz
>>>> that
>>>> DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce.  I think that would be the
main
>>>> stumbling block to separating the core development framework.
>>>>
>>>> There are some interesting areas being worked on that such as Hans
>>>> Bakker's BIRT implementation and /Jacques Le/ Roux Axis integration
for
>>>> complex types that will give the development framework even more
power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>





Reply via email to