Many thanks for your reply Sebastian, But the load balancer is being used with our applications, not with Cassandra. It just allows use to increase the through-put to Cassandra
Our Generation Tool -> Load Balancer -> Our Processing Application -> Cassandra Sebastian, is jack correct in best practices for the number of CF’s? From: Sebastian Estevez [mailto:sebastian.este...@datastax.com] Sent: 30 September 2015 17:29 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Consistency Issues Can you provide exact details on where your load balancer is? Like Michael said, you shouldn't need one between your client and the c* cluster if you're using a DataStax driver. All the best, [datastax_logo.png]<http://www.datastax.com/> Sebastián Estévez Solutions Architect | 954 905 8615 | sebastian.este...@datastax.com<mailto:sebastian.este...@datastax.com> [linkedin.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/datastax>[facebook.png]<https://www.facebook.com/datastax>[twitter.png]<https://twitter.com/datastax>[g+.png]<https://plus.google.com/+Datastax/about>[https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/24_538J0j5M0NHQx-jkRiV_IHrhsh-98hpi--Qz9b0-I4llvWuYI6LgiVJsul0AhxL0gMTOHgw3G0SvIXaT2C7fsKKa_DdQ2uOJ-bQ6h_mQ7k7iMybcR1dr1VhWgLMxcmg]<http://feeds.feedburner.com/datastax> [http://datastax.com/images/Summit_Email.png]<http://cassandrasummit-datastax.com/?utm_campaign=summit15&utm_medium=summiticon&utm_source=emailsignature> DataStax is the fastest, most scalable distributed database technology, delivering Apache Cassandra to the world’s most innovative enterprises. Datastax is built to be agile, always-on, and predictably scalable to any size. With more than 500 customers in 45 countries, DataStax is the database technology and transactional backbone of choice for the worlds most innovative companies such as Netflix, Adobe, Intuit, and eBay. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Walsh, Stephen <stephen.wa...@aspect.com<mailto:stephen.wa...@aspect.com>> wrote: Many thanks all, The Load balancers are only between our own node and not as a middle-man to Cassandra. It’s just so we can push more data into Cassandra. The only reason we are not using 2.1.9 is time , we haven’t had time to test upgrades. I wasn’t able to find any best practices for number of CF, where do you see this documented? I see a lot of comments on 1,000 CF’s Vs 1,000 key spaces. Errors around a few times a second, about 10 or so. They are constant. Our TTL is 10 seconds on data with gc_grace_seconds set to 0 on each CF. We don’t seem to get any OOM errors. We never had these issue with our first run. Its only when we added another 25% of writes. Many thanks for taking the time to reply Jack From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:jack.krupan...@gmail.com<mailto:jack.krupan...@gmail.com>] Sent: 30 September 2015 16:53 To: user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org> Subject: Re: Consistency Issues More than "low hundreds" (200 or 300 max, and preferably under 100) of tables/column families is not exactly a recommended best practice. You may be able to get it to work, but probably only with very heavy tuning (i.e., lots of time and playing with options) on your own part. IOW, no quick and easy solution. The only immediate issue that pops to mind is that you are hitting a GC pause due to the large heap size and high volume. How frequent are these errors occurring? Like, how much data can you load before the first one pops up, and are they then frequent/constant or just occasionally/rarely? Can you test to see if you can see similar timeouts with say only 100 or 50 tables? At least that might isolate whether the issue relates at all to the number of tables vs. raw data rate or GC pause. Sometimes you can reduce/eliminate the GC pause issue by reducing the heap so that it is only modestly above the minimum required to avoid OOM. -- Jack Krupansky On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Walsh, Stephen <stephen.wa...@aspect.com<mailto:stephen.wa...@aspect.com>> wrote: More information, I’ve just setup a NTP server to rule out any timing issues. And I also see this in the Cassandra node log files MessagingService-Incoming-/172.31.22.4<http://172.31.22.4>] 2015-09-30 15:19:14,769 IncomingTcpConnection.java:97 - UnknownColumnFamilyException reading from socket; closing org.apache.cassandra.db.UnknownColumnFamilyException: Couldn't find cfId=cf411b50-6785-11e5-a435-e7be20c92086 Any idea what this is related too? All these tests are run with a clean setup of Cassandra nodes followed by a nodetool repair. Before any data hits them. From: Walsh, Stephen [mailto:stephen.wa...@aspect.com<mailto:stephen.wa...@aspect.com>] Sent: 30 September 2015 15:17 To: user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org> Subject: Consistency Issues Hi there, We are having some issues with consistency. I’ll try my best to explain. We have an application that was able to Write ~1000 p/s Read ~300 p/s Total CF created: 400 Total Keyspaces created : 80 On a 4 node Cassandra Cluster with Version 2.1.6 Replication : 3 Consistency (Read & Write) : LOCAL_QUORUM Cores : 4 Ram : 15 GB Heap Size 8GB This was fine and worked, but was pushing our application to the max. --------------------- Next we added a load balancer (HaProxy) to our application. So now we have 3 of our nodes talking to 4 Cassandra Nodes with a load of Write ~1250 p/s Read 0p/s Total CF created: 450 Total Keyspaces created : 100 On our application we now see Cassandra timeout during write query at consistency LOCAL_QUORUM (2 replica were required but only 1 acknowledged the write) (we are using java Cassandra driver 2.1.6) So we increased the number of Cassandra nodes To 5, then 6 and each time got the same replication error. So then we double the spec of every node to 8 cores 30GB RAM Heap size 15GB And we still get this replication error (2 replica were required but only 1 acknowledged the write) We know that when we introduce HaProxy Load balancer with 3 of our nodes that its hits Cassandra 3 times quicker. But we’ve now increased the Cassandra spec nearly 3 fold, and only for an extra 250 writes p/s and it still doesn’t work. We’re having a hard time finding out why replication is an issue with the size of a cluster. We tried to get OpsCenter working to monitor the nodes, but due to the amount of CF’s in Cassandra the datastax-agent takes 90% of the CPU on every node. Any suggestion / recommendation would be very welcome. Regards Stephen Walsh This email (including any attachments) is proprietary to Aspect Software, Inc. and may contain information that is confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. Please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You may not further disclose or distribute this email or its attachments. This email (including any attachments) is proprietary to Aspect Software, Inc. and may contain information that is confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. Please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You may not further disclose or distribute this email or its attachments. This email (including any attachments) is proprietary to Aspect Software, Inc. and may contain information that is confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. Please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You may not further disclose or distribute this email or its attachments. This email (including any attachments) is proprietary to Aspect Software, Inc. and may contain information that is confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. Please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You may not further disclose or distribute this email or its attachments.
