I suspect they are getting size tiered in L0 - if you have too many
sstables in L0, we will do size tiered compaction on sstables in L0 to
improve performance

Use tools/bin/sstablemetadata to get the level for those sstables, if they
are in L0, that is probably the reason.

/Marcus

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Andrei Ivanov <aiva...@iponweb.net> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have the following problem:
> - C* 2.0.11
> - LCS with default 160MB
> - Compacted partition maximum bytes: 785939 (for cf/table xxx.xxx)
> - Compacted partition mean bytes: 6750 (for cf/table xxx.xxx)
>
> I would expect the sstables to be of +- maximum 160MB. Despite this I
> see files like:
> 192M Nov 18 13:00 xxx-xxx-jb-15580-Data.db
> or
> 631M Nov 18 13:03 xxx-xxx-jb-15583-Data.db
>
> Am I missing something? What could be the reason? (Actually this is a
> "fresh" cluster - on an "old" one I'm seeing 500GB sstables). I'm
> getting really desperate in my attempt to understand what's going on.
>
> Thanks in advance Andrei.
>

Reply via email to