On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, James Golick <jamesgol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Turns out that this is due to a larger proportion of the wide rows in the > system being located on that node. I moved its token over a little to > compensate for it, but it doesn't seem to have helped at this point. > What's confusing about this is that RF=3 and no other node's load is growing > as quickly as that one.
Maybe it's failing to compact for some reason?
