Node 1 should have token 42535295865117307932921825928971026432 and node 3 127605887595351923798765477786913079296 according to the formula i * (2**127 / 4) for i=1..4
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Golick <jamesgol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I ran cleanup on all of them and the distribution looked roughly even after > that, but a couple of days later, it's looking pretty uneven. > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jordan Pittier - Rezel <jor...@rezel.net > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> Have you tried nodetool repair (or cleanup) on your nodes ? >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:16 PM, James Golick <jamesgol...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I just increased my cluster from 2 to 4 nodes, and RF=2 to RF=3, using >>> RP. >>> >>> The tokens seem pretty even on the ring, but two of the nodes are far >>> more heavily loaded than the others. I understand that there are a variety >>> of possible reasons for this, but I'm wondering whether anybody has >>> suggestions for now to tweak the tokens such that this problem is >>> alleviated. Would it be better to just add 2 more nodes? >>> >>> Address Status Load Range >>> Ring >>> >>> 170141183460469231731687303715884105728 >>> 10.36.99.140 Up 61.73 GB >>> 43733172796241720623128947447312912170 |<--| >>> 10.36.99.134 Up 69.7 GB >>> 85070591730234615865843651857942052864 | | >>> 10.36.99.138 Up 54.08 GB >>> 128813844387867495544257452469445200073 | | >>> 10.36.99.136 Up 54.75 GB >>> 170141183460469231731687303715884105728 |-->| >>> >>> >> >> >
