Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:57:01PM +0200, Pieter Steyn wrote: > >> Hi Jeff, >> >> >>> The host needs to know that 192.168.213.x is routed >>> through tap0 (or whatever). >>> >> The host cannot know about 192.168.213.x in this case, I want the UML >> to be able to set it's IP to _any_ network without the host's config >> being changed. I don't want the user to even know the host is there, >> but he should be able to set the UML to whatever network he is on. >> > > Using bridging might help. Bridging eth0 and tap0 will get the host > routing out of the picture. The UML will then also be able to answer > arp requests for itself. That should take care of your local network. > > Jeff > > To do the bridging between tap1 and eth0, I have used the following commands:
brctl addbr br2 ifconfig br2 up brctl addif br2 eth0 brctl addif br2 tap1 And the eth0 did not even have an addresse (it was up, of course). Vincent Perrier ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
