Hi Jeff, > The host needs to know that 192.168.213.x is routed > through tap0 (or whatever).
The host cannot know about 192.168.213.x in this case, I want the UML to be able to set it's IP to _any_ network without the host's config being changed. I don't want the user to even know the host is there, but he should be able to set the UML to whatever network he is on. Apologies if I misunderstood your email? Regards, Pieter >On 2/21/08, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course. It's just a matter of setting up routing correctly. The > UML needs to know about routing through 192.168.210.x to get to the > outside world. The host needs to know that 192.168.213.x is routed > through tap0 (or whatever). The tricky part, depending on how > accessible you want the UML to be to connection from the outside, may > be that the rest of your network needs to know that 192.168.213.x is > routed through the host. This requires some proxy arp on the host, > which is easy if it's just the one IP. I'm not sure about proxy > arping a whole network, but I bet it's possible. > > Jeff > > > -- > Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
