J. Landman Gay wrote:

> On July 8, 2016 5:35:16 PM Dar Scott wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry I won't be there to throw candy when style suggestions
>> seem legalistic.  (Don't tell Richard and Ken, but I often use
>> naming conventions for handlers over a few lines, and even sometimes
>> for tiny ones.  I guess I'm being won over as I get older.  I had
>> thrown candy in light-hearted protest against their talk on naming
>> conventions, back in Monterey, causing a bit of confusion.)
>
> Those were the days. As a fellow objector, I too have been drawn to
> the dark side. The power was too much to resist.

Don't tell Dar, but the main reason I maintain that article is in the hope that he'll throw more candy my way.

Spoiled fruit would have been no fun, but his choice of snack-size M&Ms was perfect, a favorite. If he's taking requests I might suggest peanut M&Ms next time, or if he's looking out for my health perhaps >72% dark chocolate instead (all of chocolate's cardio benefits with minimal sugar impact). But Dar has good taste, any candy he wants to toss my way is welcome at any time. :)

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 ____________________________________________________________________
 ambassa...@fourthworld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to