So radio buttons would have the "pushed" property? Peter
On May 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 03/05/14 21:45, Dar Scott wrote: >> That reminds me… >> >> What do folks think of making the text of a checkbox either “checked” or >> “unchecked” depending on the highlight? >> >> So kids (and I) can write…. >> >> if button “multiplayer” is “checked” then >> — >> end if >> >> What about allowing button mode in object references? That might be harder. >> >> If check box “multiplayer” is “unchecked” then >> — >> end if >> >> Are these worth asking for? >> >> Dar >> >> >> > > Why not keep things simple and have something like this? : > > if the checked of btn "checkup" is true then > > 'checked' seems to make perfect sense and it keeps the standard syntax for > properties. > > Certainly a lot more intuitive than 'hilite'; which, frankly makes me think > of grey-haired ladies > going for a blue rinse . . . LOL > > Richmond. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
