According to the CEO of Livecode, my scenario DOES qualify as a commercial app, hence my consternation. I will have to pay 3 times what I currently pay now for a license just to maintain status quo, and expanding the number of users of my app is completely out of the question since I pay for the license myself.
Bob S > On Jul 25, 2024, at 5:02 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > On 26/07/2024 00:46, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: >> But the primary app I developed IS commercial by their definition. >> >> Bob S > > Commercial ? I guess so. > > But I don't see that it fits the criteria for "Internal apps"; that category > is for apps that have been developed by a company, paying either an employee > or contractor to develop it. > > In your case, you did the app in your own time, using your own LC license. > You're not employed to do coding, and didn't get paid for any coding you did. > The app, and any associated IP, belongs to you - not to any company. It > therefore qualifies as an "app for sale". > > So put the app on an AppStore (or sell it directly), and pay the 5% of > revenue plus one developer seat. > > Alex. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
