Thanks Eric, I may well go that route. I've run Parallel before - but I found all the switching, and space it took up a bit much. One reason for choosing Linux for me would be too properly integrate my development environment with how I work on the server. I rather like the idea of running my entire laptop based environment in dockers and mirroring how my servers work. That way I get to learn technology i can actually deploy rather than working so hard to translate what I work on to something that the server can run and then deploy at some reasonable scale. Still the descriptions of laptop environments running on docker are a bit on the experimental side for now...
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 21:33, JJS via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > you could use vmware to run other OS's > > But you could also do a triple boot. > > It's easier to create a multi boot on a Mac(hardware) than creating a > multiboot with hackintosh on a (win)PC > > because Windows and Linux run almost everywhere and apple provides > drivers via Bootcamp > > Running MacOs on pc is more difficult as not all videocards/other > hardware is supported > > for the first check out refind http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ and > for hackintosh check out https://tonymacx86.com > > If you only want a dualboot Mac and Windows then Bootcamp is sufficient > > > on my previous job i had a Macbook with Macos and win8.1 and win10 > > now at home i have a PC with Win10/MacOS Mojave Hackintosh/Ubuntu Mate > > > It taks patience to get it done > > So i would go for the Mac > > Op 5-3-2019 om 21:32 schreef Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode: > > For multi-platform development I prefer a MacBook Pro (16GB+ and 500+ > SSD) with Parallels Desktop installed for testing/developing on both Linux > and Windows. > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > On 05/03/2019, 20:40, "use-livecode on behalf of David Bovill via > use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > > I'll be testing on latest OSX. > > > > I'm considering buying a new laptop set up for development of this > sort. > > Will probably get another OSX laptop - but may consider getting a > Linux > > beast if the development environment works well? I wonder what the > best > > set-up is for developing for Livecode - including fancy low level > stuff? > > > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 14:01, Brian Milby via use-livecode < > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > > > The target platform link provides more details. Trevor put some > help up > > > for getting Windows versions to compile. I’ve compiled Mac and > Linux. > > > What OS/Version will you be using? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian > > > On Mar 5, 2019, 7:35 AM -0500, David Bovill via use-livecode < > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote: > > > > I'm reading up on compiling Livecode from source - will take > the plunge > > > in > > > > the coming days - would like to read up on it. The docs here > > > > <https://github.com/livecode/livecode> are sparse... anyone > written up > > > > their experience? > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 09:07, David Bovill < > david.bov...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I’ve searched around but still nothing I can find regarding > tree > > > shaking / > > > > > dead code elimination in C++. > > > > > > > > > > What I want to be able to do is not compile the whole engine, > just the > > > > > code needed for the execution of the cgi. Is this possible? > Is this on > > > the > > > > > road map? > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 18:38, David Bovill < > david.bov...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I understand that Livecode uses the LLVM compiler > infrastructure to > > > > > > create llvm bytecode that for instance emscripten can use to > > > transpile to > > > > > > javascript. I'm wandering if it is possible to do things > like: > > > > > > > > > > > > - Export the server engine to llvm bytecode? > > > > > > - Take a some livecode script, do some tree shaking and get > some nice > > > > > > compact bytecode export that uses only the bits needed by > the > > > livecode > > > > > > script? > > > > > > > > > > > > Is any of this possible now, is it planned for or looks > like it may > > > be > > > > > > possible in the nearish future / next couple of years? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > use-livecode mailing list > > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > > > subscription preferences: > > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > _______________________________________________ > > > use-livecode mailing list > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > > > subscription preferences: > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > _______________________________________________ > > use-livecode mailing list > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > use-livecode mailing list > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
