On 13 December 2012 09:57, Alex Launi <alex.la...@canonical.com> wrote: > Like any software, webapps will always be incomplete. The implementation > of the integration was not poor (at least I don't like to think so), but > there were features that got de-scoped for 12.10. Chromeless browsing in > Firefox was one item. There is a chromeless mode for Chromium, it exists > in 12.10. Chromeless mode does not, however, prevent you from having > multiple tabs. You could have 10 instances of Facebook, or YouTube in > one of these chromeless browser windows. Chromeless mode is accessed > when you have a launcher icon and launch a new instance of a webapp from > it. Integration should always work from the browser though, how else > would you find that a webapp exists?
I think that Firefox or Chromium should prompt for installing webapps like it does. Without chromeless mode, I (as a user) see webapps as being just fancy bookmarks that may also have notification or indicator support. I think chromeless mode *should* prevent you from opening multiple tabs because a standalone webapp is not a full-featured web browser (that's just the backend, an implementation detail). Links to external domains (not white-listed in the particular webapp config) should open in your regular web browser because a webapp should act like a native app as much as possible. For me, proper chromeless mode is an essential part of webapps so that's why I was disappointed with 12.10's implementation (I don't mean to hurt the feelings of those who spent months working on the feature; I expected that that feature would instead land in 13.04). Jeremy -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
