On 12/04/2013, "Martin J. Dürst" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013/04/11 16:30, Michael Everson wrote: >> On 11 Apr 2013, at 00:09, Shriramana Sharma<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Or was the Khmer model of an invisible joiner a *later* bright idea? >> >> Yes. > > Later, yes. Bright? Most Kambodian experts disagree. > > Regards, Martin. At one time there was also a proposal for an "invisible joiner" character for Tibetan. As far as possible I think "invisible" characters are best avoided as ordinarily the user can't see them and doesn't always know if one is there or not.
