Re: Why wasn't it possible to encode a coeng-like joiner for Tibetan?

[Michael Everson]

On 11 Apr 2013, at 00:09, Shriramana Sharma <samj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Or was the Khmer model of an invisible joiner a *later* bright idea?

Yes.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/