Re: Why wasn't it possible to encode a coeng-like joiner for Tibetan?

[Shriramana Sharma]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Michael S. Kaplan
<mic...@trigeminal.com> wrote:
> Qty

Uh? I even checked if that is a contraction like QED, but didn't seem
to find any explanation on the net!

--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा