Sean Miller wrote: > On 22 February 2012 13:43, Kris Douglas <krisdoug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Why is it that Unity requires the user to be an expert. A picture of > > the ubuntu logo means a lot to us, but to someone who goes and buys > > a cheap computer it means jack all. They wouldn't think to click > > there there is no hit that explains it's existence. > > > > This thread has been completely derailed, but the fact remains... Why > Unity?
I think the problem was that none of the alternatives looked compelling. Everything that was supported still is (where we say 'gnome' was supported, not 'gnome 2.x'), though, it's just that Unity is the default. -- Avi -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
