On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> How about adding such safety belts to our click packaging tools as well? >> >> e.g. bail out or present big warnings if someone tries to package up >> an app with disagreeing versions? > > Happy to do so once somebody tells me what rules we want to apply. :-)
I think a "conservative" rule to start off with might be: 1. requiring ubuntu-sdk-libs-YY.MM is valid 2. requiring exactly ONE ubuntu-sdk-libs-YY.MM-SUBFRAMEWORK is valid 3. everything else is not valid. We can later be more liberal and allow more funky combinations once we see a real need for it. Sounds good? > > -- > Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
