On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> How do we find and define what the "sane" combinations are? > > That's trivial - we can start by saying that you only get to use > combinations with the same prefix, e.g. "ubuntu-sdk-14.04*". Those will > presumably just be broken down from what might previously have been > declared as "ubuntu-sdk-14.04", so are clearly a sane combination. > > I don't think any of this should block click 0.4.14. What frameworks > you want to declare is up to you(r team); if you want to just declare > "ubuntu-sdk-14.04" then that's fine by me and click will behave as > before. I just want to have the support in place so that if and when > you need this (I predict it's "when", since this is something I've > already been asked for several times) then I don't have to scramble to > enable it in the package manager.
Sounds fine if the "old" way is still supported, let's just be careful with opening up these option for adoption by the app devs. Q: does the click package manager also take care of disabling apps that are incompatible after you get an image update that stops shipping a specific framework version? > > -- > Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
