On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I think this a great approach. Like Alexander and I have mentioned, something
> like this could get messy quickly ('"framework": "ubuntu-14.04 -
> ubuntu-14.04.3"' seems potentially ok, but '"framework": "ubuntu-14.04 -
> ubuntu-16.04"' does not).I assume point releases in frameworks should be forward compatible. So, I don't see a reason to specify something like "ubuntu-14.04 - ubuntu-14.04.3". If the app has no need for APIs added to 14.04.3, it should specify "ubuntu-14.04", and our tools should understand that it will still work on 14.04.3. cheers, -- alecu -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
