James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you are concerned about a large number of items in the list then we > should consider expiration, but I don't think this is the right way to > do it. > [...] > It does give a bad impression to new contributors though, as they may > not understand why their package is not being looked at.
Expiration leaves the users exatly here: Not understanding why their package is not being looked at. Technically, revu really *needs* some expiration mechanism for disk space reasons, and what Siegfried is proposing sounds pretty similar to that to me. I think we should be honest: We don't have enough manpower to process the revu queue. The queue is processed on a best-efford basis, and if a contributor does not find a sponsor by other means (like advertising it on our irc channel, etc) there is a good possibility for the package to be ignored. I consider expiration in the way Siegfried is proposing it as a way of implementing this. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
