On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 00:57 +0100, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote: > Hey, > > > There's currently a quite big list of packages in the "Needs review" > section of REVU, many of which date back from several months ago. > > I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have > "jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a > comment asking to change it to "jaunty", check the standards version > and some general recommendations (or perhaps just a link to a new wiki > page), so that we get ride of all those packages whose author isn't > coming back or which still need work anyway. I do understand that this > could be annoying for some users, though, so I'm asking here to hear > some more thoughts. Does anyone have strong objections to this? > > > On a related topic, I want to encourage y'all to open > http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/ right now on your web browser and start > reviewing something :). Also note that the first REVU Day this cycle > is planned for next week, Friday 7 (I'll send a reminder for this > again one or two days before). > > Regards, > > -- > Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) > Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor. >
Please do! My package Quickplay is updated for jaunty and ready for REVU. Anyone feel up to it? :) REVU http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=quickplay bzr-branch https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~cjsmo/+junk/main PPA Build logs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18756827/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.quickplay_1.2-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz Best regards Charlie -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
