Hello, On 27.02.2012 18:03, Scott Kitterman wrote: > And until there's upstream agreeement to take the patch, there's also a long > term maintenance burden that it's not obvious is worth the benefit in all > cases.
Agreed, that's a good point. If we tell new contributors that in a given case it's more sensible to forward a change upstream and coordinate getting it back into Ubuntu again and show them how to best do it, then that's a great way to get a sponsorship item resolved and off the queue. If we can add more decision making help to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews that might probably be helpful. Have a great day, Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging And follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/gplus.to -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
