-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Nilsson wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: >> Best option you have is to create a patched alternative ubuntu-desktop >> package with your own packages. > > Why not just "depend" on virtual packages like "supported-mua" > "supported-browser" and so on, and have packages like firefox provide > supported-browser?
I don't see how that helps.. How is it easier to modify multiple packages instead of modifying one package? Even still, i see where you are going with this. Depending on generic names would allow packages to be replaced with other packages without modifying the meta package. Since the meta package is created by a script, the task of modifying or creating a new meta package shouldn't be too much of a trouble. - - S -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFmVJ+qbb3MLg9dhwRAn63AKDAULRkX596XJiCvPKWLgwjQhjYjgCgtJjc dEhlP4xOlXecAiWe2sEThJE= =IvVd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
