Dear Prof. Zadeh,

To my mind, you use the invalid inference rule
"(A or B) implies (it is possible that B)".

If we combine this rule with the valid rule "A implies (A or B)",
we get the rule "A implies (it is possible that B)", where A and B
can be arbitrary, for example B can be "not A".

With best regards
Andrew

_______________________________________________
uai mailing list
uai@ENGR.ORST.EDU
https://secure.engr.oregonstate.edu/mailman/listinfo/uai

Reply via email to