Hi Stephen, On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:09:20 -0600, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 03:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:19:36 -0600, Stephen Warren > > <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > > > >> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >> > >> Seaboard has a GPIO that switches an external mux between Tegra's debug > >> UART and SPI flash. This is initialized from the SPL so that SPL debug > >> output can be seen. Simplify the code that does this, and don't actually > >> request the GPIO in the SPL; just program it. This saves ~4.5K from the > >> size of the SPL, mostly BSS due to the large gpio_names[] table that is > >> no longer required. This makes Seaboard's SPL fit within the current max > >> size. > > > > Is it possible to reorder the patch series so that Seaboard (and > > Ventana?) builds do not break temporarily between patch 2 and this > > patch? > > It would be possibel, although I'd personally rather call out the issue > explicitly with a build break; if the build succeeds, you end up using > code that silently causes memory corruption. Of course, this issue has > been around for a while, so perhaps hiding it for another couple extra > commits wouldn't be a big deal. Plus, the build break proves the assert > in the .lds file works:-) But it's not big deal either way; feel free to > re-order the commits if you want. No need: your points are valid. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
