Hi Minkyu, On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0900, Minkyu Kang <proms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang <proms...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Albert, > > > > On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of > >> u-boot-arm/master. > >> > >> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request > >> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of > >> the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from > >> previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive > >> testing from Tom. > >> > >> Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform > >> and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal > >> master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d. > >> > >> All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please > >> rework this request to take this rollback into account. > >> > >> Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master > >> back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of > >> course the choice is yours. > >> > > > > OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday. > > sorry. spi, not i2c. > > > Is it OK? It's ok, but note that it won't be included in the 2012.10 release anyway, as monday is the release date. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
