Dear Prabhakar Lad, In message <ca+v-a8vz-715el1mnvxhycgnwv5ysguonn5hzqemfn5zktp...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > I really like the idea of annotating functions with proper description, > > thus I > > would like to ask, can we reach a general agreement and start using > > kerneldoc in > > U-Boot to annotate functions and possibly generate documentation? Or shall > > we > > use anything else? > > > +1 for kerneldoc.
Could you please explain what exactly your vote is supposed to mean? Shall it become mandatory for all new code submitted? Shall all patches submitted from now on be rejected when the code they touch is not accordingly documented? What is the goal you see for using this? I'm afraid I don't know what exactly you voted for... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de How many QA engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? 3: 1 to screw it in and 2 to say "I told you so" when it doesn't work. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
