Hi all! I've had a discussion with Wolfgang just now about U-Boot coding style. I tried using KernelDoc in a patch, which is not part of the U-Boot Coding Style now, thus it was rejected.
I really like the idea of annotating functions with proper description, thus I would like to ask, can we reach a general agreement and start using kerneldoc in U-Boot to annotate functions and possibly generate documentation? Or shall we use anything else? Or any other annotation stuff? Doxygen style? Shall it be optional or mandatory? See [1] in Linux kernel tree for what I mean. [1] Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
