Hi Marek, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi all! > > I've had a discussion with Wolfgang just now about U-Boot coding style. I > tried > using KernelDoc in a patch, which is not part of the U-Boot Coding Style now, > thus it was rejected. > > I really like the idea of annotating functions with proper description, thus I > would like to ask, can we reach a general agreement and start using kerneldoc > in > U-Boot to annotate functions and possibly generate documentation? Or shall we > use anything else? > +1 for kerneldoc.
Regards, --Prabhakar Lad > Or any other annotation stuff? Doxygen style? Shall it be optional or > mandatory? > > See [1] in Linux kernel tree for what I mean. > > [1] Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
