Am 09/08/2012 21:29, schrieb Eric Nelson: >>> Why do you not pass the mode to do_resetmode_cmd() and let this function >>> parse the argument, without these help functions ? Then we do not need >>> to add new functions if we have, for example, mmc2 or mmc3. >> >> These functions are requested shortcuts. >> "bootmmc0" is the same as "resetmode mmc0 && reset" >> > Hi Troy, > > As one of the few that made this request: > > I take it back... > > I was mostly after a single command that also performs 'reset', > and agree with Stefano that an argument for the mode is a better > implementation.
+1 > > U-Boot> bootto usb > U-Boot> bootto mmc > > I'm also rethinking the request for 'resetmode' because > of the conflict with 'reset' (i.e. 'res' is no longer a > unique command-complete). Yes, there is no reason to have a conflict with "reset" > The first implementation with > 'rsmode' seemed to be an odd abbreviation. > > Anybody else have a suggestion? > > U-Boot> rstmode usb && reset > U-Boot> bmode usb && reset In Freescale documentation this is called "boot mode" - using the same terminology can reduce confusion. I do not discuss which name is better, but if someone reads the SOC's manual and then find a command for "boot mode", it is normal that he automatically knows what is going on. "Boot" conflicts with other u-boot command, then "bmode" is my first choice. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
