Dirk,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for testing it. I found one mistake and will submit a fix shortly.
Here is one issue I found:
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/imx-common/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/imx-common/cpu.c
@@ -147,6 +147,4 @@ u32 get_ahb_clk(void)
ahb_podf = reg >> MXC_CCM_CBCDR_AHB_PODF_OFFSET;
return get_periph_clk() / (ahb_podf + 1);
-
- return 0;
}
This should be fixed, but it seems it does not explain the problem you
are seeing. We need to check whether get_ahb_clk() is using the weak
definition of get_periph_clk() instead the one from clock.c.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
