On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:04, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 08:08:30PM +0530, R Sricharan wrote:
>
>> The nominal opp vdd values as recommended for
>> ES1.0 silicon is set for mpu, core, mm domains using palmas.
>
> OK, this creates some trivial conflicts with
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/144137/ but also raises a functional
> problem / question.  Is this patch also changing the order to match what
> Nishanth did or does this patch also need that functional change done
> (and a v3) ?  Thanks!
Glancing at this patch, I see that scale sequence is still mpu, core,
MM - which is what my sequence fixes. will be nice to have the
sequence fixed followed by cleanup/update to retain the sequence
appropriately.

+       /* Palmas settings */
+       volt = VDD_MPU;
+       do_scale_vcore(SMPS_REG_ADDR_12_MPU, volt);

-       /* VCORE 1 - for vdd_core */
-       volt = 1000;
-       do_scale_vcore(SMPS_REG_ADDR_VCORE1, volt);
+       volt = VDD_MM;
+       do_scale_vcore(SMPS_REG_ADDR_45_IVA, volt);

-       /* VCORE 2 - for vdd_MM */
-       volt = 1125;
-       do_scale_vcore(SMPS_REG_ADDR_VCORE2, volt);
+       volt = VDD_CORE;
+       do_scale_vcore(SMPS_REG_ADDR_8_CORE, volt);

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to